On this page we'll see how well Rokuyo performed on days of major disasters that have hit the world.
These include earthquakes, tsunami, floods, typhoons/cyclones/hurricanes, extreme heat, and other events which have resulted in tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths, and often suffering for millions of survivors.
However, these events usually build up over several days, so aligning them to a specific Rokuyo day is not possible. A notable exception is an earthquake, and the timing of those are quite precise.
So for this survey, we list the major earthquakes from the start of this century. Also for this survey, we've changed the term "bad luck" to "misfortue" which seems more appropriate.
(Incidentally, we refrain from calling earthquake "natural disasters" because...)
Rokuyo is quite balanced, which is what you'd expect from this yin-yang system.
It has an equal amount of good fortune and misfortune, as shown in the Fortune Indicator below.
Fortune Indicator |
| |||
Sensho | ||||
Tomobiki | ||||
Sakimake | ||||
Butsumetsu | ||||
Taian | ||||
Shakku |
represents each earthquake (and attributed fatalities) at the appropriate position on the Rokuyo day's Fortune Indicator. |
Gujarat, India (20,005) 2001 Jan 26 08:46 sakimake | |
Indian Ocean (227,898) 2004 Dec 26 07:58 sensho | |
Kashmir, India & Pakistan (87,351) 2005 Oct 08 08:50 tomobiki | |
Yogyakarta, Indonesia (5,782) 2006 May 26 05:53 tomobiki | |
Sumatra, Indonesia (1,115) 2009 Sep 30 17:16 sensho | |
Haiti (100,000–316,000) 2010 Jan 12 16:53 tomobiki | |
Tōhoku, Japan (19,749) 2011 Mar 11 14:46 tomobiki | |
Nepal, Nepal & India (8,964) 2015 Apr 25 11:56 sakimake | |
Sulawesi, Indonesia (4,340) 2018 Sep 28 18:02 tomobiki | |
Haiti (2,248) 2021 Aug 14 08:29 sensho | |
Turkiye & Syria (59,259) 2023 Feb 06 04:17 butsumetsu |
For Rokuyo to succeed, the earthquakes should always happen on the misfortune part of the Fortune Indicator bar, but the above chart shows this is not the case. Of the eleven earthquakes, only three were on the misfortune part. The survey uses a tiny sample; all the more reason to question why we don't see 100% scores.